Related Video Collections
All Comments
Does Barack Hussein Obama invite terrorists over to dine on fetuses and use the American flag to wipe their...? mouths while discussing how to undermine capitalism, export American jobs to India, and take away all of our freedoms? After that, do they proceed to have a gay orgy in the Oval Office, then kill puppies for no reason?
Or is he the black Superman, whose farts smell like roses and repair the damage to the ozone? And when he burps, poverty disappears and polar ice caps reform And we he smiles, the HIV viruses self-destruct?
Just want to know! | | Neither. You're a jerk who doesn't know what they are talking about | Gay situation hellp??? ..? well im a guy 17 years old and gay.. im white cause im Caucasian. and i really like black african american men... dis is a serious question please even though i might sound like a total dum bass dnt make fun of me.. well today when i was in school. in my algebra class i was imagining that i was having an orgy with pure really hott black guys .. that they were all taking turns on me. it was like 10 hot black guys... so yea i got really turned on.. and i got an erection. and i just couldnt help it i asked da teacher if i could go to da restroom and went to jack off... . so i want to know if this is normal..?? . that i my imagination always goes crazy like that? like for example its not the first time something like dis happens. it always happens,,, so like wat is it? hormones or wat? thanks... | First off, no fantasy is abnormal. It's all in how we deal with them. Vivid fantasies are a sign of a healthy imagination, so the more creative the better!
The important thing is to keep them in proper perspective. Such as it probably wouldn't be the safest or healthiest thing to actually try to live this one out for obvious reasons.
Don't sweat it. You're 17, enjoy your daydreams!
As far as the masturbation in the school bathroom, you wouldn't be the first. As long as its in a locked stall who cares.
Pay no attention to the doomsayers above who say you are icky or evil. | IS it really so unbelievable that rev. wright said these things? I keep hearing from people and the news that they just cant believe that rev. wright said these things . Well then you obviously don't hang out with alot of black people because most of my friends believe almost everything that man said . And really i cant blame them . Lets start with him claiming that the us created aids to kill black people . This theory is bogus but is it really any worse than the theory scientists have come up with . I mean do you really believe someone went to Africa , had sex with a monkey , flew back to America , had a gay orgy , and thats how aids got spread . Yeah , i don't know about you , but i don't know too many people who have sex with monkeys . Now for him to say 9-11 was " chickens coming home " or whatever the hell he said . Look , it doesn't matter what you believe about 9-11 , he has no right to dis those poor people who died on that day . So i can understand why people are upset about that . But the truth is , my friends believe everything he said . | He has a right to his opinion. Freedom of speech. If some people think Rev. Wright is a nut case or crazy, that should take what he say with a grain of salt. I like Rev. Wright. I don't think he should be an issue for the election. Sometime the truth hurts. Rev. Wright is respected in Chicago. The chicken come on the roost wasn't said in the 9/11 sermon. The media is lying about that. I listen to the whole sermon. You can go on CNN too. They did a full behind the story on Rev. Wright. The white government years ago gave syphilis to black soldiers as a Ginny pig. If they can do that and enslave blacks for 400 years, I wouldn't put it pass them to put drugs and aids in the black community. This rumor has been floating around the black community for years.
:p | Why are we suppose to hate Michael Jackson ? Why am I suppose to forget him because he has died? Elvis dies-the world is suppose to be shocked and mourn him forever, king of rock.....NOT MINE!
Kurt Cobain dies- OMG! he was a big rock legend, crack addict
Heath Ledger dies- he was the f_a_g in broke back mountain but who cares, he died and played the joker
Anna Nicole- the wh0re of Wh0res, but who cares, she died forgive her
Marilyn Monroe- Hollywood homewrecker, died from sleeping pill overdosing but yet she's an Icon for sex symbols everywhere
Freddie Mercury- Gay died of aids, had gay orgies but he's a rock legend(love him though)
(I respect most of those people but points need to be proven)
Michael Jackson- INNOCENT ON ALL F'N ACCOUNTS, NO PROOF OF ANYTHING BUT A MAN WANTING TO BE A BOY, SO WE ARE SUPPOSE TO PEOPLE ALL OF THE BLAME ON HIM. WHY ? EITHER BECAUSE HE WAS BLACK OR WAS IT BECAUSE HE WAS TOO GENIUS FOR THIS WORLD??? | | I'm not trying to sound racist but it is definitely because he was black. Michael Jackson never got the respect he deserved for being a great person. Many whores have died and people who aren't really musically gifted...yet nobody says sh*t. I agree on everything you said. | Sour gummy worms is so lame, agreed? Here are the gay users
1. Donzi
2. Sour Gummy worms
3. Authentic Black American
I think they all need to have an orgy! | | Donzi and Sour Gummy worms are funny and Authentic Black American is really annoying and yes lame | How many gays in the military supporters on here have actually gone into battle? Where will you bunk openly gay men? How about showering? You can't put them with straight men because it would kill morale. You can't put them together because it would be an orgy.
Go read "The Heart of Darkness" and try to understand that war makes people do horrible things they wouldn't ordinarily do. No alcohol, no sex, no civilized life, and only the stress of possibly dying makes men go crazy. This is not black and white men; this is about men who find others sexually attractive and it will negatively impact military operations.
Gay men would be ostracized in war zones. That's the last thing the military needs is just one little thought in the back of someones head on whether or not their buddy is worth saving. | | There is no room for somebody that is fighting for our country to have to worry about somebody looking as their ***. | I Have A Question...? So, here's the deal. If you don't believe me, sorry...Every word is verifiably true...
When I was 15 I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, not long after I found out that my step-dad had just gotten my best friend pregnant. I did what any self-respecting girl would do the next year, arranged for an age marriage that lasted about 4 months, until I found out my best friend was pregnant with my husband's guy.
So I left the state and started anew with a new guy and a GED in tow. I decided college was a good idea, so I enrolled in online classes because people scare me. I got an associates degree before divorcing my second husband.
Then I met my best online friend of 6 years, who came over on a work visa from South Africa. We got married 3 months later so he could stay in the country... He did not get my ex-best friend pregnant, though I did catch him in bed with HIS best friend, another guy. The next day I got an email telling me that he's realized he's gay. He flew back to South Africa without saying goodbye and now frolics under satin sheets with hairy fat men in cheetah-print underwear in a house known as a 24/7 homosexual orgy.
My fourth husband beat the **** out of me, causing me to have a miscarriage. He's also, surprisingly, crazier than I am.
So here's my question...I have a date with a guy I met on Craigslist last night. I'm 26 years old. Should I wear red shoes or black? | Awh! I am so so sorry you had to go through all that. :(
&& I'd wear the black shoes. Best of luck on your date. | Why is it that so many at Pride Marches tend to be a bit lewd in their costume and behavior? I'm a gay man in his late twenties in Massachusetts and I have to confess that being at one tends to make me feel a bit uneasy. Not for fear of persecution, but, because I'm surrounded by what oft looks an orgy in pantomime. How is it that so many believe that showing such in public induces pride when all it may do is scare people to the other side of the argument against us? I really don't get it. I'm not suggesting that we should all be covered head to toe and that the atmosphere should be squeaky clean, but, I came upon a guy wearing just a black jockstrap in public at one in the city of Northampton recently and he was far from alone in wearing almost nothing. | They've seen all those lewd heteros in the Mardi Gras in New Orleans and think it would be fun to be like them.
By the way, the Stonewall riots were started by perfectly normal gay men NOT by drag queens, street guys, etc., who may have joined in later but certainly did not start it. The legend of those street guys, drag queens and transsexuals is just that, a legend that has grown to be believed by many people, even Wikipedia gets it wrong ! | Is being homosexual or bisexual unnatural? READ THIS BEFORE YOU RESPOND WITH "THE BIBLE LOLOL"
If the definition of "natural" is that it's found in nature, then how can something so well documented as homosexuality be found in hundreds and even thousands of other animal species?
one of our two closest relatives, the Bonobo, are well known for having sex all day. They use it as a communication and bonding tool. And they have sex with other males, females, and in big orgies. Every one of them is bisexual.
Dolphins are well known to have gay sex with eachother, even raping other species of porpoise.
in fact, here are just SOME of the animals WELL DOCUMENTED to have been gay, even forming life bonds (in the case of penguins) of male-male relationships:
Black swans
Gulls
Mallards
Penguins
Amazon Dolphin
American Bison
Bonobo and other apes
Bottlenose Dolphins
Elephants
Giraffes
Humans
Japanese Macaque
Lions
Polecat
Sheep
Spotted Hyena
Dragonflies
Fruit flies
Lizards
as a zoology student, I find it hard to believe you can call something so common in NATURE, UNNATURAL | Homosexuality, well, not being homophobic...
It's a common mistake to make in the wild, with animals, especially in locusts; humans know wiser not to engage in this mistake, and it is sexual orifice abuse in nature's standards, its name is buggery; and anal intercourse by a male to a female is just as common; so its not an orientation, or congenital, it is a mistake, even if it is preferred more than vaginal intercourse; but that's not the point in copulation, pleasure is just one thing that entices animals into procreation; animals don't even need to think about it, everything else just comes naturally under bodily control. not mind.
It's common because the anus is near enough in the same place as the vagina in many animals.
And it's natural for same sex animals to masturbate each other in a homosexual way, in fact, in the wild, you'd be a recluse to not join in same sex masturbation; oral, anal, penile and vaginal masturbation could be classed as copulative behaviour, but in the wild (outside our civilisation, across the vast civilisations of many, if not most animals whom live on this very planet). Humans masturbate each other, whatever gender and it doesn't mean they are homosexual; because sexuality in procreation terms, is a penile penetrative intercourse, such as anal and vaginal. Technically, such activities are not homosexual, they are homophilic; because its not exactly sexual, and it isn't natural, it just happens commonly, its a flaw, a defect, but not always; it has its pros and cons, just like any other sexuality and paraphilia.
Homosexuality isn't as bad as thing as what humans do, either; humans no better not to have sex with the same gender, as you may know; exercising such behaviour is most likely to spread disease, this is because the anus is a trap of virii and bacterium, when secretive materials on their own can't spread disease, or are unavailable.
Such diseases like HIV and AIDs are shown to be of the worse; but their original sources are unknown, apart from SIV, as a zoonotic disease, not necessarily transacted via bestiality, in fact, highly unlikely, in fact the transaction of blood via wounds may have original caused to disease to have spread, and its origin is Africa (possibly from a Sooty Mangabey with SIV, and SAIDs).
Homosexuality is just a recreational form of sex, adopted by the minds of animals seeking pleasure, and in avoidance of depression, anal intercourse is great for receiving sexual pleasure, but at the same time, keeps breeding under control; majorly, nature only accepts recreational sex, to ensure animals don't give up on the need for sex.
Nature just wants biological organisms to continue breeding, become more advanced, and continue existing, for as long as possible; its just the flow of balance; homosexuality is not nature's problem. Only with logic, you can see such patterns. For, if this was not so, you probably wouldn't be reading this right now, let alone be existent, and alive. It's unnecessary for us even to exist, let alone homosexuality to, just you happen to be here, and that's the point. That's what homophobes, pro-homosexuals, homophiles and homosexuals alike don't understand on the matter.
And heterosexuality is dearly needed, and with the neglect of homosexuality, heterosexuality should accelerate the prevention of extinction. Homosexuality is a danger to all species, in the angle of extinction; as we need to breed.
Heterosexuality is something that's only needed to administer the growth of organised living beings group. Homosexuality must only be something for pleasure, not a humble choice. That's why bisexual best, but bisexuality can spread homosexually isolated diseases into heterosexual culture. Look at it, however you must. Its quite a debate, lot's of arguments. But they are the ethical and logical facts.
Yes, its completely unnatural, you do realise animals also can be unnatural, and humans are animals.
Well, only one thing can be natural, because to be natural means choosing the 'right path', and there can't be more than one 'right path'. So from what you, and many others are saying, heterosexuality is unnatural. I know, what a great idea, a civilisation with no heterosexuals, just imagine, no future generations; well if your sane, and understand, here it comes, therefore homosexuality is unnatural. But you use unnatural as it being not allowed; in a sense it is wrong, but who says it's not allowed ~ asking the question on the bounds of nature, adds to my thinking, that homosexuals just like to differ from others; because they didn't succeed being better than everyone else, they want to differ into a smaller group, where, psychologically speaking, is an easier area of obtaining the top position of your ethnic group, LGBT.
If, wherefore, heterosexuals are the one's who are being unnatural, thence you are not; meaningly, in a senseless way; being the logic wrong; - homosexuals, by the hand of psychology, by the words of the debate of which homosexuals and bisexuals alike defend themselves are; are pathologically taking it personal, and therefore enjoying all the attention, it gives them something to live about, to fight for, to thrive for, - adding a meaning to life; so in many pathways, homosexuality is insanity and an attention seeking process, philosophically speaking.
You, and others may be zoological students; but in such a short time, you've seen this, certainly, recent study and thought, yay, gays and lesbians are natural; - did you not dare even attempt to look at the inner details, or look at opposing studies; or would it upset you to say that there are much more opposing studies than these few on their own?
Nobody knows what's naturally, technically. But philosophically speaking, if homosexuality is natural, heterosexuality is not; wherefore that can't be so, it is the very essence of nature, that flows in the direction, that sex should be only of breeding and evolution, and as with placental mammals, the only way this can be achieved is in the state of having a female capsule, to produce the young, and a male fertiliser, to fertilise the female when enticed by sexual allure that females emit, only when they need to (normally programmed chronologically, for example, every month - menstruation), this is to avoid over-breeding; males should only have sex with females, and that's to copulate, so the female can procreate the young, the next generation.
When a homosexual commits to sexual activity, at least one time, one of two persons will act as a female, and the other, a male. Surely, the heterophobe is wrong to state such activities and positions are wrong, because they are copying, as a homosexual, the act of heterosexuals, in the form of emulation. Both missionary and doggie positions are heterosexual, homosexuals can't do missionary, but they can do doggie and other positions that heterosexuals do. Don't the limitations say something; well that's because nature didn't exactly outflow in reasoning for homosexuality; sodomy is not the meaning of procreation.
You may seem to be growing the question, I am, indeed a homophobe and/or heterosexual, how can I be, I am homosexual, and a bisexual at that.
In the end of the day, homosexuality is wrong, and unnatural; but many things are. Nothing stops you from continuing, as with all other forms of sodomy, and in Abrahamic religions, like all sins, except blasphemy, are forgivable. And the whole of sodomy is pure recreation. Homosexuality should stop in the question disease, and people who one sex, but act they other, are extremely 'queer', in that term; I speak my opinion, feminine gay sex is cheesy, and it is not a good example for promoting procreation, and gay propaganda is ruining the heterosexual world. If you want to be heterosexual, be heterosexual; if you want to be homosexual, be homosexual - don't be phobic to each other, neither race has any other importance, stop throwing your opinions down each others necks and live your own lives; pushing too hard will only cite revolution and war; and no one wants that. With gay pride, and things like gay adoption, that's wrong too; if you want to act heterosexual, are sure your instinct don't want you to be heterosexual altogether. There's bisexuality, why not try that? It spreads diseases between heterosexuality and homosexuality, but as long as your happy between you, why should other's suffer at your expense. Gays have got rights, for marriage, etc, you can live your own life, same for heterosexuals - what's the problem?
Sodomy is recreation, end of.
Heterosexuality is needed, too, end of.
In a perfect world, no one would fight, and would choose their own sexuality freely, may be pansexuality and bisexuality are more ideal prospects, same for other sodomy forms, even that in heterosexual, what about bestiality, proven victimless too. But in a truely perfect world, no living thing would have concentrated intelligence, like humans do, because it creates social divisions, and logic is only used at choice, being obstinate, and retardation, etc. But beyond that sermon, I mark out my religion as being philosophical, yes with proof, no bias or ostentation; but I wouldn't call the love of wisdom, philosophical, could I marry it, should I have sex with it?
Humankind won't be pleased until it has destroyed itself, only philosophy can lead those into the eyes of truth. Or have I entered a plane of distorted spacial territory; my words may add confusion; but these aspects are correct in their own right.
Read more (permanent linkage):
blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea… | Why is it that the L's and G's in LGBT recently feel the need to say that B's are following a trend.? I'm bisexual, and I'm certainly not following a trend. I know I have an interest in both genders, the same way someone else knows that they like the opposite or same sex. Why is it that recently, a lot of Lesbian and Gay people always say that I'm faking it, or I just don't want to admit that I'm gay? Just because some people act bisexual to be cool, doesn't automatically mean everyone that says that they're bisexual are sex hungry and just trying to be cool. I have an interest in both men and women, the same way someone might like both black and white people, or blondes and brunettes at the same time. Why can't people just accept that? I'm sick of the strereotype that goes around saying that bisexual people are sex freaks and participate in orgies, etc. I'm a virgin, and plan to be until I know I've found someone that I can trust very much, and that I love very much. I also hate that people think bisexuals need men and women at the same time...It's not that we need both, it's just that we're open to both genders, the same way someone might be open to dating all races. This is kind of a rant, but I just wish people would stop saying that I'm faking it. | I'm a lesbian and I don't think that bisexuals are following a trend. I think that some people (mostly dumb college girls, sadly) FAKE being bisexual because it's 1) "trendy" to them and 2) guys go wild for it. But those people aren't bisexual and I don't CONSIDER them bisexuals.
I have a lot of sympathy for you guys because of what you deal with. I completely believe in bisexuality and I hate that people parade under it to be sexually promiscuous when they aren't actually bisexual. If anybody I'm around so much as makes a comment stereotyping bisexuals (you know, "they're all sluts" "they're just hiding that they're gay" blah blah blah) I am VERY quick to educate them. And boy, when I was in college, I can't tell you how many dumb drunk girls I screamed at for perpetuating a stereotype that seriously hurt people who were bisexual.
I have NO patience for people who pretend they are things they are not, and so it really bothers me when I run into girls pretending to be "bi" just to attract guys because they think it's cute or hot or cool. They have no idea how their actions REALLY affect people who are actually bisexual. I've gone through it a lot (but for being schizophrenic... so many people think it's "cool" or "funny" to claim they hear voices and are oh em gee so schizo!) and I have no patience when people do it to others.
Just try to educate people as best you can. You definitely have a lot of Ls and Gs out there fighting for you. :]. |
|